CTS+PLT+2011-+2012


 * Wolf Creek School Division #72**
 * Lacombe Composite High School**
 * // Professional Learning Community Project 2011/2012 //**


 * Project Title || ** CTS Clusters **   ** Demonstrating Evidence and Achievement of Outcomes **  ||

Team Members:
 * Name ||  Title and Responsibilities  ||
 * Darcie Zenchuk || Resource Person/ curler ||
 * Hans van Velzen || Team Leader/Facilitator / chopper ||
 * Dirk Anderson || Tech Support / geekmeister ||
 * Brent Chalmers || Recorder / Presenter / raconteur ||


 * Project Goal || To record and catalogue student achievement outcomes ||

Wikis and access to technology. ||
 * Outcome(s) ||  Critical Evidence  ||  Strategies  ||  Timelines  ||  Resources  ||
 * Establish structures for students to demonstrate their outcome achievements || Visual record of student evidence || Student take pictures or create digital records of their exemplary achievements  || Year end || Group dynamic and synergy ||
 * Share ideas between CTS Clusters || Every cluster member will use all strategies || Create Collaborative strategies to share ideas between various CTS clusters.  || Year end || Aisi team leaders,


 * PLT Time || 5 hours. ||

Group Summary (to be completed May, 2012) // - What worked well (successes)? // // This group really appreciated scheduled meetings, time allowance, efficiency of co-workers, and the opportunity to provide visual and verbal feedback to students. The students were involved in celebrating their successes and told us many times they were looking forward to including exemplars in their portfolios. // // Allowing the students the opportunity to demonstrate their work, gave inspiration to other students to do self assessment and reflection of their own work. // // Despite being a diverse group from a variety of teaching backgrounds, //// our professionalism and ethics allowed us to work well together. // // - What did not work so well (challenges)? // // Not enough alloted time to delve into all of the areas we would have liked. Enabling // // the students to be able to achieve their outcomes is unique to the individual, therefore, having the students achieve the same outcome // // can at times be difficult as time constraints preclude some learners from meeting the objectives. // // - Any unanticipated results or effects? // // When students are aware that you are documenting/archiving their work, their output improves. // // - What supports are needed to make this project repeatable? // // More resources and time. Cross curricular interactions and support. // // - Is any Administrative follow-up required? // // Not at this time. // || Evidence of student collaboration and success. Administrative Comments
 * ** Focus questions: **

Administrative Certification
 * Name ||  Position  ||  Signature  ||
 * Wolf Creek Public Schools**
 * École Secondaire Lacombe Composite High School**
 * //Professional Learning Team Project 2011-2012//**
 * École Secondaire Lacombe Composite High School**
 * //Professional Learning Team Project 2011-2012//**


 * Project Title || **Foodies at Work** ||

Team:
 * Name ||  Title and Responsibilities  ||
 * David Irwin || Captain Coolio – Advisor to the Stars ||
 * Jaclyn Van Velzen || Deputy Awesome – Brains Behind the Scenes ||
 * Kandice Adamson || Sidekick Super – Brains Behind the Scenes ||

(include common strategies/actions that apply to each members’ subject areas) Individual Goal à || **//#9 – Provide Evidence Demonstrating Achievement of Outcomes//** To be awesome in every way and a productive member of my team : ) (Kandice) || To help the young little one find her way on the righteous path in the kitchen kingdom (Dave) ||
 * Team Goal à
 * //-meaning: there will be a common rubric, expectations/routines/procedures, but there can also be different food products between Domestic Foods/Food Prep.//**
 * Other Individual Goals (optional) || To obey the rule of Mr. Irwin in the kitchen kingdom (Jaclyn)

(Completed) || -Each other -new CTS curriculum guide -internet || (Completed) || -student projects/products || Sept 19th - 1 hour, room 1138 Dec 16th - 1 hour, room 1138
 * Strategies ||  Critical Evidence  ||  Outcomes  ||  Timeline  ||  Resources  ||
 * **-to work together to finalize rubrics** || -rubric that is used on a daily basis to assess the students level of performance || -to promote a common expectation of student work ethic between the sub programs of Foods and Food Prep || By Sept 30th
 * **-to show examples of student work that show the outcome being achieved (ex: pictures of student work in labs)** || -Pictures of students' work || -to show a variety of products within the curriculum || By March 9th
 * See more evidence in PLT duotang***
 * || 2.0 hours   Total  ||
 * Times met as a PLT group:
 * See more evidence in PLT duotang***
 * || 2.0 hours   Total  ||
 * Times met as a PLT group:

PLT Reflection Time

Group Summary (to be completed May 2012) //- What worked well (successes)?// //Working in close conjunction with the other Foods program, and being in close proximity of each other for a cohesive work environment eg: Dave's chopping demos for Domestic Foods students, Domestic Foods students learning the commercial equipment in Foods 10 (tours, etc), consistent courses presented in Foods 10 to Domestic and Commercial students so students can choose either stream in a 20 level Foods or cake decorating and have equal footing.// //- What did not work so well (challenges)?// //Ensuring that the students in Commercial Foods and Domestic Foods are achieving the same outcomes from the curriculum. We discovered that due to percentage of pratical time in the kitchen being different we had to change the weighting accordingly. eg: Commercial Food evaluation is more heavily based on the practical end rather than the theory end and Domestic Foods is 50/50......Commercial Foods is 70% on practical work in Gradebook, and Domestic Foods is 50%.// //- Any unanticipated results or effects?// //As stated above : )// //- What supports are needed to make this project repeatable?// //That both sides are cooperative and work in conjunction with each other.// //- Is any Administrative follow-up required?// //Yes, we would all like to go to Disneyland.......please!// ||
 * **Focus questions:**
 * [[file:PLT2012 pics.pptx]][[file:10scale Rubric PRACTICAL.docx]] ||

Administrative Comments

Administrative Certification
 * Name ||  Position  ||  Signature  ||